Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center

Home / Search for "search.html/treatments/giantcell.html"

Search Results for: search.html/treatments/giantcell.html

Colchicine

What is colchicine?

Colchicine is an oral drug used in the treatment of some forms of cutaneous vasculitis. It is a very old medicine that is more frequently encountered in the treatment of gout.

How does colchicine work?

Colchicine seems to work by preventing immune cells from becoming fully activated.

How is colchicine given?

Colchicine is given as an oral pill at a dose of 0.6 mg either once or twice per day.

Side effects:

In contrast to most other vasculitis treatments, colchicine is not an immunosuppressant drug and does not cause any significant risk of infection.

Colchicine can cause gastrointestinal side effects and requires monitoring during its use. Some patients with kidney disease may not be able to safely take colchicine on a long-term basis.

Buerger’s Disease

First Description

This disease was first reported by Buerger in 1908, who described a disease in which the characteristic pathologic findings — acute inflammation and thrombosis (clotting) of arteries and veins — affected the hands and feet. Another name for Buerger’s Disease is thromboangiitis obliterans.

Who gets Buerger’s Disease (the “typical” patient)?

The classic Buerger’s Disease patient is a young male (e.g., 20–40 years old) who is a heavy cigarette smoker. More recently, however, a higher percentage of women and people over the age of 50 have been recognized to have this disease. Buerger’s disease is most common in the Orient, Southeast Asia, India and the Middle East, but appears to be rare among African–Americans.

Classic symptoms and signs of Buerger’s Disease

The initial symptoms of Buerger’s Disease often include claudication (pain induced by insufficient blood flow during exercise) in the feet and/or hands, or pain in these areas at rest. The pain typically begins in the extremities but may radiate to other (more central) parts of the body. Other signs and symptoms of this disease may include numbness and/or tingling in the limbs and Raynaud’s phenomenon (a condition in which the distal extremities — fingers, toes, hands, feet — turn white upon exposure to cold). Skin ulcerations and gangrene (pictured below) of the digits (fingers and toes) are common in Buerger’s disease. Pain may be very intense in the affected regions.

An angiogram demonstrating lack of blood flow to vessels of the hand (figure below). This decreased blood flow (“ischemia”) led to ulcers of the fingers and severe pain.

An abnormal result from an angiogram of the hand (figure below).

Despite the severity of ischemia (lack of blood flow) to the distal extremities that occurs in Buerger’s, the disease does not involve other organs, unlike many other forms of vasculitis. Even as ulcers and gangrene develop in the digits, organs such as the lung, kidneys, brain, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract remain unaffected. The reasons for the confinement to the extremities and sparing of other organs are not known.

What Causes Buerger’s Disease?

The association of Buerger’s Disease with tobacco use, particularly cigarette smoking, cannot be overemphasized. Most patients with Buerger’s are heavy smokers, but some cases occur in patients who smoke “moderately”; others have been reported in users of smokeless tobacco. It has been postulated that Buerger’s Disease is an “autoimmune” reaction (one in which the body’s immune system attacks the body’s own tissues) triggered by some constituent of tobacco.

Pictured below, are a patient’s fingertips that have developed gangrene. This is a very painful condition which sometimes requires amputation of the affected area.

How is Buerger’s diagnosed?

Buerger’s disease can be mimicked by a wide variety of other diseases that cause diminished blood flow to the extremities. These other disorders must be ruled out with an aggressive evaluation, because their treatments differ substantially from that of Buerger’s Disease (for Buerger’s, there is only one treatment known to be effective: complete smoking cessation — see below).

Diseases with which Buerger’s Disease may be confused include atherosclerosis (build–up of cholesterol plaques in the arteries), endocarditis (an infection of the lining of the heart), other types of vasculitis, severe Raynaud’s phenomenon associated with connective tissue disorders (e.g., lupus or scleroderma), clotting disorders of the blood, and others.

It should be noted that other substances, such as marijuana, have also been associated with a vasculitis similar to Buerger’s or polyarteritis nodosa that should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Angiograms of the upper and lower extremities can be helpful in making the diagnosis of Buerger’s disease. In the proper clinical setting, certain angiographic findings are diagnostic of Buerger’s. These findings include a “corkscrew” appearance of arteries that result from vascular damage, particularly the arteries in the region of the wrists and ankles. Angiograms may also show occlusions (blockages) or stenoses (narrowings) in multiple areas of both the arms and legs.

Pictured below on the left is a normal angiogram. On the right, is an abnormal angiogram of an arm demonstrating the classic “corkscrew” appearance of arteries to the hand. The changes are particularly apparent in the blood vessels in the lower right hand portion of the picture (the ulnar artery distribution).

In order to rule out other forms of vasculitis (by excluding involvement of vascular regions atypical for Buerger’s), it is sometimes necessary to perform angiograms of other body regions (e.g., a mesenteric angiogram).

Skin biopsies of affected extremities are rarely performed because of the frequent concern that a biopsy site near an area poorly perfused with blood will not heal well.

Treatment and Course of Buerger’s

It is essential that patients with Buerger’s disease stop smoking immediately and completely. This is the only treatment known to be effective in Buerger’s disease. Patients who continue to smoke are generally the ones who require amputation of fingers and toes.

Despite the clear presence of inflammation in this disorder, anti-inflammatory agents such as steroids have not been shown to be beneficial. Similarly, strategies of anticoagulation (thinning of the blood with aspirin or other agents to prevent clots) have not proven effective. The only way to prevent the progression of the disease is to abstain from all tobacco products.

Causes of Vasculitis

There are many different types of vasculitis, some with different causes than others.

Certain forms of vasculitis that can be due to infection where the microbe directly invades the vessel wall. Syphilis is one example of vasculitis that can be caused by infection in the blood vessel. Treating the infection is the main goal in managing this sort of vasculitis, which is not an autoimmune disease, but rather an infection.

Other infections can provoke the immune system into causing damage in blood vessels. Here, the infection is the trigger, but the immune system is the cause of the vascular damage. Viral hepatitis (B and C) are examples of this sort: some patients with Hepatitis B may develop polyarteritis nodosa, while some patients with Hepatitis C may develop cryoglobulinemic vasculitis.

Other types of vasculitis may be due to an ‘allergic‘-type reaction to medications. For example, certain blood pressure medications (hydralazine) or thyroid medications (propylthiouracil) can trigger ANCA associated vasculitis in some patients. Cocaine is an illicit drug that is linked to vasculitis and vascular damage.

However, the causes of most vasculitides are currently unknown. While we can identify some risk factors (such as older age in giant cell arteritis), we do not know the specific causes of these diseases. These forms of vasculitis of unknown cause are considered autoimmune diseases.

Under normal circumstances, our immune system serves to defend us from infection and other threats, such as cancers. In autoimmune diseases, the immune system generates a response not against a foreign threat, but against normal “self” tissues. This abnormal immune response against “self” tissues can result in a wide array of autoimmune diseases, including relatively common diseases (such as psoriasis or thyroid disease) as well as rare conditions (such as vasculitis).

In most cases, autoimmune diseases are believed to be due to an abnormal immune response that is generated in a susceptible person, and eventually leads to a cycle of ongoing inflammation in otherwise normal tissues where no infection or other identifiable threat is present. Some interaction between the immune system and the environment is thought necessary for this to occur, and a person’s genetic background likely places some individuals at higher risk than others.

A better understanding of the specific causes of these diseases would lead to improved means of diagnosing, treating, and even preventing these conditions. Uncovering the causes of vasculitis is a major goal of vasculitis research.

While we may not know the specific causes of the vasculitidies, we do have a basic understanding of the way that the immune system causes organ damage in these conditions. In all forms of vasculitis, activation of the immune system leads to the deposition of inflammatory cells and proteins in the walls of blood vessels. As this inflammation in blood vessels continues, the vessels become damaged and no longer serve their normal function of delivering blood to the organs that they supply. Consequently, the tissues downstream of these inflamed vessels are starved of oxygen and nutrients needed for normal function. At a basic level, this is a process similar to what occurs in a heart attack or a stroke – but instead of the cholesterol plaque that blocks a coronary artery in a heart attack, the immune system is responsible for blockage of blood vessels in vasculitis.

All information contained within the Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center website is intended for educational purposes only. Visitors are encouraged to consult other sources and confirm the information contained within this site. Consumers should never disregard medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something they may have read on this website.

Linda’s Loop

contributed by Brenda Shilling

I have always known that chronic and life-threatening diseases can have a devastating effect on people’s lives. I’ve seen it happen to friends’ families and heard of it happening to friends of friends. But until 2002, the realities of such challenges were quite remote to me, as I had never felt a loved one struggle with a serious condition.

Linda Gray and her twin sister, Brenda Shilling.

In the spring of 2002, my identical twin, Linda, was diagnosed with neuropsychiatry lupus and central nervous system vasculitis. It was a scary time for all of us, particularly for Linda and her family. Like many lupus patients, Linda had been ill often and had many problems in the years leading up to her diagnosis. We were extremely thankful that The Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center quickly identified what was wrong and started Linda on a treatment program.

In the months that followed, I watched my sister experience a multitude of emotions, including devastation over her diagnosis, fear for her future, and relief that she had finally found help. Although I know that not all lupus patients fare well, I learned that the treatment of lupus has come a long way over the years and I prayed that Linda would benefit from these advances. Her treatment was extremely challenging. However, during the hard realities of chemotherapy and steroids on Linda’s body, her spirit was amazing.

Despite knowing that family is extremely important during times like this and that frequent calls, letters, and visits to Linda were supportive, I slowly began to feel helpless. This was an unexpected emotion. I wanted to do more. I needed to do more. My sister was going through the most difficult time of her life, and I had do something more.

One morning in the late spring of 2003 I considered coordinating a bicycle ride to raise funds for The Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center. Our sister, Liz, thought it was wonderful idea and wanted to help. We were driven by love for our sister and that was all the motivation we needed!

Linda Gray and her sister, Liz Adams.

We decided on a 50-mile ride – short enough to manage but long enough to sound good! We then mailed over 200 letters to friends and family asking for a financial gift to The Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center in honor of our sister and others with her disease. We also distributed the letter to social and religious groups in which we are involved. Four of our friends asked if they could join us on the bike ride in a generous gesture of support. We even had t-shirts made!

Linda's Loop Participants

Participants in Linda’s Loop:

Left to Right: (Front Row, kneeling) Georgann Pattillo, Jan Rowe, Bill Schilling ; (Middle Row) Kevin Adams, Linda Moore, Liz Adams, Sue Schilling, Brenda Schilling, Betty Lamey, Patrick Pattillo, Leroy Lamey ; (Back Row) Chandler Burroughs, Steven Rowe, and Bill Schilling, Sr.

The night before the ride, we finished packing up drinks, snacks, and lunches and then headed home to get some sleep. Liz told me that she didn’t sleep a wink that night – neither did I! We were too excited.

The day finally arrived and everything went so well. It was such a wonderful day that I simply didn’t want it to end! Our family and friends came out to cheer us along. It felt great to have them there. But wow! The miles were more difficult than I expected. Although three riders finished far ahead, the remaining three of us dragged ourselves over the finish line some time later. We were quite the motley crew!

Hot, sweaty, hungry, but happy!

Response to our effort was overwhelming. My husband Bill teases that this was the only time I actually picked up the mail! Liz and I were moved by all the contributions. Some were from people who don’t know Linda but had read about the ride in the local paper. When we started planning we weren’t sure how much money we could raise. It was wonderful to have received just over $8,600 in contributions to vasculitis research!

Linda told me how much love she felt because of what we did for The Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center. What more could I have asked of myself? We wanted to show Linda how proud we were of all she accomplished during her difficult treatment. We also wanted to say thank you to The Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center for the wonderful work they do in caring for their patients everyday.

Hopefully we accomplished both.

All information contained within the Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center website is intended for educational purposes only. Visitors are encouraged to consult other sources and confirm the information contained within this site. Consumers should never disregard medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something they may have read on this website.

Rheumatoid Vasculitis

First Description

Rheumatoid Vasculitis (RV) is an unusual complication of longstanding, severe rheumatoid arthritis. The active vasculitis associated with rheumatoid disease occurs in about 1% of this patient population.

RV is a manifestation of “extra-articular” (beyond the joint)rheumatoid arthritis and involves the small and medium-sized arteries in the body. In many of its disease features, RV resembles polyarteritis nodosa.

Other common extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis, such as inflammation in the sac surrounding the heart (pericarditis), inflammation in the lining of the lungs (pleuritis), and interstitial lung disease (resulting in fibrosis or scarring of the lungs).

Who gets Rheumatoid Vasculitis? A typical patient

RV can affect a person from any ethnic background, either gender, and from any age group. However, more often than not, the typical patient has long-standing rheumatoid arthritis with severe joint deformities from the underlying arthritis. Although the arthritis has usually led to significant joint damage, at the onset of RV the joint disease is paradoxically quiet.

Figure: Patient with joint damage from rheumatoid arthritis. Note the bulbous swelling of some knuckles and lateral (ulnar) deviation of the fingers.

Classic symptoms of Rheumatoid Vasculitis

RV has many potential signs and symptoms. The manifestations of RV can involve many of the body’s different organ systems, including but not limited to the skin, peripheral nervous system (nerves to the hands and feet) , arteries of the fingers and toes causing digital ischemia, and eyes with scleritis. Scleritis (inflammation of the white part of the eye) commonly occurs in the setting of RV. This ocular complication requires urgent treatment with immunosuppressive medications.

Figure: Digital ischemia – this image shows a blood flow deficiency in the tip of the finger caused by an obstruction of the digital artery.

Figure: Scleritis – Inflammation of the sclera (the white of the eye) causing redness, light sensitivity and pain.

In addition, generalized symptoms such as fever and weight loss are common.

As is true with other forms of vasculitis that involve the skin, cutaneous lesions can erupt on various areas of the body in RV, with a predilection for the lower extremities. Typical findings include ulcers concentrated near the ankles.

Figure: Cutaneous ulcer – an open skin sore caused by an obstruction of the small blood vessels in the superficial ulcers or obstruction of medium vessels in a deeper ulcer.

Small nail fold infarcts (small spots around fingernail) can

occur in rheumatoid arthritis

but these do not necessarily signify the presence of systemic vasculitis and do not necessitate a change in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

Nerve damage can cause foot or wrist drop, known in medical terminology as “mononeuritis multiplex”. The images below show a patient with a right wrist drop and a patient with right foot drop. This condition, which may be significantly disabling, is often preceded by a change in sensation in the same area (numbness, tingling, burning, or pain). These abnormal sensations can progress to muscle weakness, focal paralysis, and eventually to muscle wasting. Recovery from this condition, caused by nerve infarction, can take months. In some cases, recoveries from mononeuritis multiplex are incomplete.

Figures of drop wrist and drop foot (courtesy of the University of North Carolina)

(Video of drop foot viewable on our Microscopic Polyangiitis page under classic symptoms.)

Laboratory Tests

Most laboratory findings in RV – for example, elevations in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein – are non-specific, and reflect the presence of a generalized inflammatory state. Hypocomplementemia, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), and atypical anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are common. Rheumatoid factor levels are usually extremely elevated. However, there is no definitive laboratory test for RV short of a tissue biopsy. The diagnosis must usually be made using a combination of history, physical examination, pertinent laboratory investigations, specialized testing (e.g., nerve conduction studies), and sometimes a tissue biopsy.

Because the treatment implications for RV are major, any diagnostic uncertainty must be met with definitive approaches to establishing the diagnosis. This usually involves biopsy of an involved organ. Deep skin biopsies (full-thickness biopsies that include some subcutaneous fat) taken from the edge of ulcers are very useful in detecting medium-vessel vasculitis. Nerve conduction studies help identify involved nerves for biopsy. Muscle biopsies (e.g., of the gastrocnemius muscle) should be performed at the same time as nerve biopsies, to increase the chance of finding changes characteristic of vasculitis. Imaging studies have no consistent role in the evaluation of RV, although sometimes angiography of the gastrointestinal tract is useful.

What Causes Rheumatoid Vasculitis?

The cause of RV is unknown, but given the prominence of immune components and the pathologic changes in involved blood vessels, an auto-immune process is suggested.

How is Rheumatoid Vasculitis diagnosed?

Most laboratory findings in RV – for example, elevations in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein are non-specific, and reflect the presence of a generalized inflammatory state. Hypocomplementemia, anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs), and atypical anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (atypical ANCAs) are common. Rheumatoid factor levels are extremely elevated, as a rule. However, there is no definitive laboratory test for RV short of a tissue biopsy. The diagnosis must usually be made by the combination of history, physical examination, pertinent lab work, other specialized testing (e.g., nerve conduction studies), and sometimes even a tissue biopsy is required.

The diagnosis of RV should be considered in any rheumatoid arthritis patient who develops new constitutional symptoms, skin ulcerations, decreased blood flow to the fingers or toes, symptoms of a sensory or motor nerve dysfunction (numbness, tingling, focal weakness); or any inflammation of the lining around the heart or lungs (pericarditis or pleurisy/pleuritis).

Patients with a history of joint-destructive rheumatoid arthritis are at an increased risk for infection. Therefore, when a rheumatoid arthritis patient presents with a new onset of non-specific systemic complaints an infection must first be eliminated. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis typically have immune systems that are disordered from previous immunosuppression and underlying disease (e.g., joint damage). This patient population, therefore, is at higher risk of infection.

The differential diagnosis of RV includes:

  • Cholesterol embolization syndromes, in which a piece of cholesterol breaks off of a plaque, may cause digital ischemia (blood flow obstruction to a finger or toe), and a host of other symptoms that mimic vasculitis.
  • Diabetes mellitus is another major cause of mononeuritis multiplex, but multiple mononeuropathies occurring over a short period of time are unusual in diabetes.
  • Many clinical features of RV mimic those of polyarteritis nodosa, cryoglobulinemia, and other forms of necrotizing vasculitis. Therefore they too should be considered in this setting.

Because the treatment implications for RV are major, any diagnostic uncertainty must be met with a definitive approach to establishing the diagnosis. As alluded to earlier, this usually involves the biopsy of an involved organ. Deep skin biopsies (full-thickness biopsies that include some subcutaneous fat) taken from the edge of ulcers are very useful in detecting medium-vessel vasculitis. Nerve conduction studies help identify involved nerves for biopsy. Muscle biopsies (e.g., of the gastrocnemius muscle) should be performed at the same time as nerve biopsies, to increase the chance of finding changes characteristic of vasculitis. Imaging studies have no consistent role in the evaluation of RV, although sometimes angiography of the gastrointestinal tract is useful.

Normally, the cells of the blood vessel wall would be fewer in number (less thick) and the lumen (larger red area) would be larger. The arrow points (Figure 6, left) to an inflamed blood vessel found on a muscle biopsy. The globular pink areas are muscle fibers.

Treatment and Course of Rheumatoid Vasculitis

Therapy should reflect the severity of organ involvement. Prednisone or other steroid therapies are often the first line of treatment. Optimizing treatment of the underlying rheumatoid arthritis is also essential, therefore medications such as methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may be employed. In the setting of impending damage to major organs such as the eyes, a peripheral nerve, the gastrointestinal tract, or of a severe skin ulceration, cyclophosphamide is usually warranted.

What’s New in Rheumatoid Vasculitis?

Compared to other forms of vasculitis, there has been relatively little research in recent years on the specific entity of RV. The lack of similarity in available reports on RV and discrepancies in case definitions have created challenge to building standard approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. There is some evidence that the incidence of RV has decreased over the past several decades, perhaps because of better treatment of the underlying rheumatoid arthritis.

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Who gets Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis?

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis is nearly equally distributed between the sexes, with a slight male predominance. Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis typically occurs in middle age, but is found in people of all ages. Although it is unusual for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis to occur in childhood, it is not unusual for a Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis patient to be in his/her 70s or even 80s at the time of diagnosis.

Pictured below is a chest x–ray showing bilateral lung nodules in a 27 year old Indian man with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.

Pictured below is a CT scan from the same patient. The view is a cross–section through the patient’s lungs. The CT scan not only permits a better appreciation of the lesions’ size, it also detects more lesions.

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis can affect virtually any site in the body, but it has a predisposition for certain organs. The classic organs involved in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis are the upper respiratory tract (sinuses, nose, ears, and trachea [the “windpipe”]), the lungs, and the kidneys. Listed below are the organs commonly involved in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and the specific disease manifestation(s) in each organ.

Ear

Ear infections that are slow to resolve. Recurrent otitis media. Decrease in hearing.

Eye

Inflammation can occur in different parts of the eye. Inflammation in the white part of the eye is known as the sclera (“scleritis”). “Uveitis” is inflammation within the eye. Inflammation behind the eye is known as an “orbital pseudotumor”. An orbital pseudotumor such as those caused by Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis can cause “proptosis”, or protrusion of one eye.

Pictured below is a computed tomography (CAT) scan of the eyes in a patient with a retro–orbital mass (a mass behind the eye) in a man with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Masses such as these sometimes cause an abrupt loss of vision through stretching or compression of the optic nerve, which enters the back of the eye.

Nose

Nasal crusting and frequent nosebleeds can occur. Erosion and perforation of the nasal septum. The bridge of the nose can collapse resulting in a “saddle–nose deformity”. Pictured below is an example of this deformity before and after cosmetic surgery. This resulted from the collapse of the nasal septum caused by cartilage inflammation. This patient has Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis, but an identical lesion may occur in Relapsing Polychondritis.

Sinuses

Chronic sinus inflammation that sometimes leads to a destructive process of tissues around the sinuses.

Trachea

A characteristic respiratory tract complication of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: narrowing of the “windpipe” just below the vocal cords, a condition called “subglottic stenosis”. This narrowing, caused by inflammation and scarring, causes difficulty breathing and may, after a subacute progression, necessitate emergency tracheostomy. Pictured below are two figures that show subglottic stenosis before (left) and after (right) surgery, performed by an Ear, Nose, & Throat specialist. The surgery provided dramatic improvement in the patient’s breathing.

Lungs

A pneumonia–like syndrome, with lung “infiltrates“ can be seen on chest x–ray. Bleeding from the lungs can occur.

Kidney

Inflammation can occur in the kidney, leading to small (or rarely, large) amounts of blood and protein in the urine. This condition is called glomerulonephritis. If not treated aggressively, Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis’s involvement of the kidneys can lead to kidney failure. Renal masses can occur, but are very unusual in this disease.

The image below is from a urinalysis of a patient with kidney inflammation. When Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis is active, red blood cells will form a clump or “cast” (bracketed in white) within the tubules of inflamed kidneys. These “casts” pass through the renal system and may be viewed under the microscope in a patient’s urine.

Skin

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis can cause many kinds of skin rashes. The most common rash occurs in the form of small purple or red dots on the lower extremities (known as “palpable purpura”). Inadequate blood flow to fingers and toes can lead to Raynaud’s phenomenon (extreme sensitivity of the fingers to cold) and even infarctions of the tips of fingers and toes, with the development of gangrene.

Joints

Arthritis can occur, with joint swelling and pain.

Nerves

Peripheral nerve involvement leads to numbness, tingling, shooting pains in the extremities, and sometimes to weakness in a foot, hand, arm, or leg.

Miscellaneous

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis involvement of nearly all organs has been described, including the meninges (the layers of protective tissue around the brain and spinal cord), the prostate gland, and the genito–urinary tract. In addition to involving specific organs, Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis also commonly results in generalized symptoms of fatigue, low–grade fever, and weight loss.

The cause of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis is not known. Compared to diseases with obvious genetic predispositions, genetics appear to play a relatively small role in the etiology of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis . It is very unusual for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis to occur in two people in the same family. (It is possible, however, that less obvious genetic risk factors exist, e.g. genes that might pre-–dispose a patient to infection with an etiologic organism). For some time, an infection has been suspected of causing (or at least contributing to) Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , but no specific infection (bacterial, viral, fungal, or other) has been identified.

How is Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Diagnosed?

Whenever possible, it is important to confirm the diagnosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis by biopsying an involved organ and finding the pathologic features of this disease under the microscope. Because many diseases may mimic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (and vice versa), before starting a treatment regimen it is essential to be as certain of the diagnosis as possible. We discuss some of the specific biopsy procedures used to diagnose Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis in the section of this Websie entitled What is Vasculitis: Diagnosis?.

Because Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis so often involves the upper respiratory tract (sinuses, nose, ears, and trachea [“windpipe”]) and because biopsy of these tissues is a relatively non–invasive procedure, these sites are frequently biopsied in patients suspected of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis . Unfortunately, the yield of biopsies from these sites is rather low: probably less than 50%. Therefore, sometimes more invasive procedures are required to make the diagnosis.

Lung biopsy (either open or thoracoscopic) is often the best way of diagnosing Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis . The ample amount of tissue obtainable through these procedures usually permits confirmation of the Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis diagnosis. Similarly, although the amount of tissue obtained through a kidney biopsy is usually much smaller, the finding of certain pathologic features in the context of a patient’s overall symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests is frequently diagnostic.

Since 1982, when ANCAs (anti–neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies) were first described, the role of these antibodies in the diagnosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis has grown. ANCA testing, which involves the performance of a simple blood test, has achieved wide availability during the 1990s. This is both good and bad: use of ANCA tests has led to earlier diagnoses and more rapid institution of appropriate treatment in many cases, but has also resulted in misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment when the tests are not performed or interpreted correctly.

As their name implies, ANCAs are directed against the cytoplasm (the non-nucleus part) of white blood cells. Their precise role in the disease process remains uncertain but is a topic of considerable research interest. ANCAs come in two primary forms: 1) the C–ANCA [C stands for cytoplasmic] and, 2) the P–ANCA [P stands for perinuclear]. C–ANCAs have a particularly strong connection to Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (up to 80% of patients — and possibly more of those with active disease — have these antibodies). When C–ANCAs are present in the blood of a patient whose symptoms or signs suggest Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , the likelihood of the diagnosis increases considerably. In most cases, however, it is still VERY IMPORTANT to biopsy an involved organ to verify the diagnosis.

Treatment and Course of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Until the 1970s, Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis was nearly always a fatal condition. The use of prednisone and other steroids helped prolong patients’ lives, but most patients eventually succumbed to the disease within a few months or years. The first use of cyclophosphamide in the late 1960s began to change the terrible prognosis of this disease. Using the combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone, more than 90% of patients with severe disease respond to treatment, and 75% are able to achieve disease remissions. Unfortunately, Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis is a disease in which relapses frequently occur. Approximately half of all patients who achieve disease remissions eventually suffer recurrences (“flares”). Flares of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis are usually responsive to the same treatment that induced remission, but sometimes intensification of treatment (for example, changing to a more powerful medication) is required.

During the 1990s, physicians have increasingly used the combination of methotrexate and prednisone rather than cyclophosphamide and prednisone for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis patients who do not have immediately life-threatening disease (particularly disease that does not involve the kidneys severely), because of the frequency of severe side-effects associated with the latter regimen.

Bactrim (or Septra), a combination of two antibiotics (trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole) may also be helpful in the treatment of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , particularly in patients whose disease is limited primarily to the upper respiratory tract. A large, multi-center study demonstrated that Bactrim is useful in preventing flares of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis in the upper respiratory tract.

What’s New in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis?

In the past few years, significant advances have been made in understanding Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , although many important questions remain. In addition to an improved understanding of how to use the currently available medicines for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , it is likely that the next few years will witness the development of new medicines for this disease. Scientific breakthroughs may lead to the design of more specific modulators of the immune system that are of great benefit to patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis .

In medical terms, by David Hellmann, M.D.

A discussion of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis written in medical terms by David Hellmann, M.D. (F.A.C.P.), The Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center, for the Rheumatology Section of the Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program published and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (Edition 11, 1998). The American College of Physicians has given us permission to make this information available to patients contacting our Website

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis is a disease involving granulomatous inflammation, necrosis and vasculitis that most frequently targets the upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, and kidneys. Although Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis can begin at any age, the average age of onset is about 40 years. Other organs frequently affected by Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis granulomatosis include the eye (proptosis and double-vision from retro-orbital pseudotumor, scleritis), skin (ulcers, purpura). or peripheral nerve (mononeuritis multiplex). Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis may be limited to one site for many months or years before disseminating. Systemic symptoms (fever, fatigue, weight loss) are also common. Anemia, mild leukocytosis, and elevated Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are nonspecific laboratory findings. Chest radiographs often show infiltrates, nodules, masses, or cavities; only hilar adenopathy is incompatible with the diagnosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. CT of the chest is more sensitive than chest radiography and can be abnormal when the chest radiograph is negative. Glomerulonephritis causes hematuria, erythrocyte casts, and proteinuria.

A novel group of autoantibodies, ANCAs, helps support the diagnosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and related forms of vasculitis and gives insight into the pathogenesis of these diseases. ANCAs are directed against enzymes cantained in primary granules of neutrophils and monocytes. Two main types of ANCAs are recognized. The C-ANCAs are directed against serine proteinase 3 and are relatively sensitive and highly specific for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. The P-ANCAs are directed against myeloperoxidase and other antigens and are not specific for any single form of vasculitis, but have been seen in some patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa, Churg-Strauss vasculitis, and some forms of pauci-immune glomerulonephritis (referred to as microscopic polyarteritis nodosa). Some patients with pulmonary-renal syndromes that may not fit the critieria for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis are also seropositive for ANCAs. Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, or SLE may have atypical P-ANCA test results, based on the autoantibodies directed against other neutrophil constituents such as lactoferrin.

ANCAs may be not only markers for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and related disorders, but they may also be actors in pathogenesis. Studies show that when neutrophils are exposed to cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor, small amounts of serine proteinase and myeloperoxidase, the targets for ANCAs, are expressed on the surface of neutrophils. Adding ANCAs to these cytokine-primed neutrophils causes them to generate oxygen radicals and release enzymes capable of damaging blood vessels.

The diagnosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis is established most securely by biopsy specimens showing the triad of vasculitis, granulomata, and large areas of necrosis (known as geographic necrosis) admixed with acute and chronic inflammatory cells. Only large sections of lung tissue obtained via thoracoscopic or open lung biopsy are likely to show all of the histologic features. However, more easily obtained biopsy specimens of the nose, or sinuses may show several of the changes that are highly suggestive of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis. Such a biopsy specimen combined with a compatible clinical picture and seropositivity for C-ANCAs should suffice to secure the diagnosis. Seropositivity for C-ANCAs alone is not specific enough to establish the diagnosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis.

Untreated Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis is fatal. Prednisone may slow progression of the disease but by itself is insufficient to arrest the disease. Respiratory tract disease usually progresses slowly, but renal disease can progress rapidly and therefore warrants urgent evaluation and treatment. With the traditional treatment of prednisone (initiated at 1 mg/kg daily for 1 to 2 months. then tapered) and cyclophosphamide (2mg/kg daily for at least 12 months), more than 90% of patients improve and 75% remit. However, 50% of the patients who later remit also relapse, and oral daily cyclophosphamide causes serious toxicity. Short-term toxicity includes cytopenia, infection, and hemorrhagic cystitis. Long-term use of cyclophosphamide in patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis more than doubles the risk of cancer overall, increases the risk of bladder cancer 33-fold and the risk of lymphoma 11-fold. Monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide appears less toxic but also less effective. Weekly, methotrexate appears to be an effective alternative for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis that is not immediately life-threatening, and it also appears to be beneficial in maintaining remission. The role of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in treating active disease is controversial, with some finding it effective for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis limited to the respiratory tract, and others not. In patients who have achieved remission, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole reduces the relapse rate.